Home/Services/Systems integration/Accounting that reconciles itself
Services · Systems integration · Accounting that reconciles itself

Billing that matches what was delivered. Checked by the system, monthly.

The CRM here, QuickBooks there, a spreadsheet gluing it together, and billing that doesn't match what was delivered. We make the field and job systems talk to accounting, with creep flagged automatically.

Accounting that reconciles itself
RECONCILED · MONTHLY
The leak

The glue is a spreadsheet. And a person who maintains it.

ALL TRADES · IT SERVICES AND MSPS
The glue spreadsheet

One workbook joins the CRM to QuickBooks. It's right as of the last time someone updated it.

THE GLUE
Billing that doesn't match

Seats, devices, and agreements drift from what's actually deployed. The gap is revenue you already earned.

CREEP
Month end by hand

Someone spends days making the systems agree, every single month.

MONTH END
What we build

The systems agree by themselves

TAKES COST OUT

Field and job systems talking to accounting. Seats, devices, and agreements reconciled monthly, with creep flagged.

The spreadsheet retires, month end shrinks, and the billing gap closes. This takes cost out and picks up money you already earned: unbilled seats and agreement creep show up as a flag, not a year-end surprise.

An agent reads both ledgers, matches what it can, and files the exceptions with the context attached. It runs as a scheduled job overnight, so the first thing you see in the morning is the short list. Where it matters we build the checks in too: a daily job that tests the system and flags drift before you find it at month end.

FAQ

Straight answers

We're on QuickBooks. Does that work?
Yes. We build against the accounting system you have, in your accounts. Every line of code is yours from the first commit.
What does it cost to start?
The first step is the Workflow Sprint: $8,500 flat, 30 days. You get the Leak List, the architecture, and one automation live on your real data. Live in 30 days, or you don't pay.
Who reviews what gets flagged?
Your people. Anywhere the system touches money, a human reviews the exceptions. It flags, you decide.
Are we locked into one AI vendor?
No. We are model-agnostic by design: the model is a component, not the architecture. When a better one ships we swap it, and what we built for you keeps running.